Great!! . You have already started reviewing it. Although I must admit
, I have not been able to write it with the pace I wanted (should've
been done by now). Too much travel right now. Will work on it tonight.
On 9/18/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 5:36 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
>
> >> Fantastic! You the one, Karan ;) (easier to rhyme now that I know
> >> how to pronounce your name :)
> > ;)
> >
> >> That first explanation at the top is too long. If you can think of
> >> another way to express the default, go for it.
> > Yes, I also want to express it clearly and concisely (wanted to keep
> > Dario's feedback in mind too), and what to keep and what to get rid
> > of. Thats why it will really help if I can get some feedback on this
> > topic once I finish writing it.
>
> Looking at your work in progress and wanted to give you an FYI.. The
> "{deploymentId}{interfaceType.annotationName}" is two variables. The
> "interfaceType.annotationName" part is just one variable, i.e. there
> is no plain "annotationName" variable.
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
