Changing the format:
I should be able to change the JNDI name format by adding the
following in conf/system.properties and restarting the server, right?
openejb.jndiname.format={moduleId}{deploymentId}{interfaceType.annotationName}
Somehow its not working for me, and I am trying to write some
examples, but want to test them first. I know that the idea of
conf/system.properties was proposed somewhere in february, I think I
saw it implemented in the codebase, but am not sure about that. Did we
ever implement this feature of conf/system.properties? If not, then I
really really think we should have this feature.
If we did implement it, then why is it that my openejb.log is showing
the following:
2007-09-18 21:22:27,093 - DEBUG - Using
openejb.jndiname.strategy.class
'org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.JndiBuilder$TemplatedStrategy'
2007-09-18 21:22:27,093 - DEBUG - Using openejb.jndiname.format
'{deploymentId}{interfaceType.annotationName}'
2007-09-18 21:22:27,109 - INFO - Jndi(name=GreeterBeanRemote) bound
to Ejb(deployment-id=GreeterBean)
2007-09-18 21:22:27,109 - INFO - Jndi(name=HelloWorldBeanRemote)
bound to Ejb(deployment-id=HelloWorldBean)
2007-09-18 21:22:27,109 - INFO - Created
Ejb(deployment-id=GreeterBean, ejb-name=GreeterBean, container=Default
Stateless Container)
2007-09-18 21:22:27,109 - INFO - Created
Ejb(deployment-id=HelloWorldBean, ejb-name=HelloWorldBean,
container=Default Stateless Container)
On 9/18/07, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, Thanks.
> (I used the word "snippets" in my email and still didn't figure out
> the name of the plugin - Duh)
>
> On 9/18/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 18, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> >
> > > David,
> > >
> > > You had once mentioned a plugin for confluence which could be used to
> > > include the code snippets from a java file into confluence . My mind
> > > is totally drawing a blank on that plugin name. Help!
> >
> > It's the snippet plugin. Check out the wiki markup on some of the
> > examples pages.
> >
> > -David
> >
> > >
> > > On 9/18/07, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Great!! . You have already started reviewing it. Although I must
> > >> admit
> > >> , I have not been able to write it with the pace I wanted (should've
> > >> been done by now). Too much travel right now. Will work on it
> > >> tonight.
> > >>
> > >> On 9/18/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sep 16, 2007, at 5:36 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Fantastic! You the one, Karan ;) (easier to rhyme now that I
> > >>>>> know
> > >>>>> how to pronounce your name :)
> > >>>> ;)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> That first explanation at the top is too long. If you can
> > >>>>> think of
> > >>>>> another way to express the default, go for it.
> > >>>> Yes, I also want to express it clearly and concisely (wanted to
> > >>>> keep
> > >>>> Dario's feedback in mind too), and what to keep and what to get rid
> > >>>> of. Thats why it will really help if I can get some feedback on
> > >>>> this
> > >>>> topic once I finish writing it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Looking at your work in progress and wanted to give you an FYI..
> > >>> The
> > >>> "{deploymentId}{interfaceType.annotationName}" is two variables.
> > >>> The
> > >>> "interfaceType.annotationName" part is just one variable, i.e. there
> > >>> is no plain "annotationName" variable.
> > >>>
> > >>> -David
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Karan Singh Malhi
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Karan Singh Malhi
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Karan Singh Malhi
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
