Hi Joe,
Just had a look at the MEJB App.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/applications/geronimo-mejb/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mgmt/MEJB.java
Won't setting the mappedName in the @Stateless(name="ejb/mgmt/MEJB")
annotation completely bypass the troublesome code in
GeronimoMappedName and solve the problem?
Regarding JNDI link to map MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB you
need to bind a javax.naming.LinkRef at MEJBGBean/MEJB with the
linkName as mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB.
Regards
Manu
On 10/8/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> >
> >> NOTE: This was also posted on the Geronimo dev list.
> >>
> >> We've been hitting some errors in the TCK tests that validate mgmt
> >> with MEJB. The main problem was that we were failing the name lookup:
> >>
> >> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name
> >> "java:openejb/Deployment/MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management"
> >> not found
> >>
> >> I thought this was strange because we don't include the MEJBGBean any
> >> longer in the geronimo assembly and I could find no reference to it in
> >> the Geronimo code at all.
> >>
> >> It turns out that we map to the "GBEAN" name when there is no
> >> mappedName specified in the Openejb code. In
> >> o.a.openejb.config.GeronimoMappedName at line 65 there is this piece
> >> of code which Geronimo is apparently very dependent upon
> >>
> >> if (null == mappedName && ref.getEjbRefName().equals("ejb/MEJB")) {
> >> ref.setMappedName("MEJBGBean/MEJB");
> >> }
> >>
> >> So I assume the mappedName must always be null and we need to force
> >> this mapping for Geronimo?
> >>
> >> Once I modified the name to match the newly enabled MEJB app's id,
> >> "mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB", then I finally started to see failures that
> >> matched what Anita indicated we should see without the correct
> >> authorization.
> >>
> >> So what should we do with this openejb change? We were hoping to
> >> release Geronimo 2.0.2 with openejb 3.0-beta-1 which has the old name
> >> still included. There are probably other ways around this that would
> >> only require Geronimo (such as making the new name match the old name
> >> ... but that's really ugly) or perhaps TCK configuration changes. Any
> >> suggestions?
> >
> > How about you add a JNDI link from MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB?
>
> Thanks Dain. I'd gladly to give this a try but I have no clue how to go
> about defining a JNDI link to map MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB.
> So far my searches have turned up anything that helps. Can you give
> me some pointers?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
