Hi,

Another cause for the problem may be the presence of this class
org.apache.openejb.mgmt.MEJBBean.java in openejb-core which may be
getting deployed.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/3.0-beta-1/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/mgmt/MEJBBean.java
So you may need to do a rebind of the jndi link at that location. I am
not very sure but you may need to bind linkrefs at
MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management etc.
Dain can probably clarify more on this.

Regards
Manu



On 10/9/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>               Just had a look at the MEJB App.
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/applications/geronimo-mejb/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mgmt/MEJB.java
> Won't setting the mappedName in the @Stateless(name="ejb/mgmt/MEJB")
> annotation completely bypass the troublesome code in
> GeronimoMappedName and solve the problem?
>
> Regarding JNDI link to map MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB you
> need to bind a javax.naming.LinkRef at MEJBGBean/MEJB with the
> linkName as mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB.
>
> Regards
> Manu
>
> On 10/8/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > > On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> > >
> > >> NOTE:  This was also posted on the Geronimo dev list.
> > >>
> > >> We've been hitting some errors in the TCK tests that validate mgmt
> > >> with MEJB.  The main problem was that we were failing the name lookup:
> > >>
> > >> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name
> > >> "java:openejb/Deployment/MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management"
> > >> not found
> > >>
> > >> I thought this was strange because we don't include the MEJBGBean any
> > >> longer in the geronimo assembly and I could find no reference to it in
> > >> the Geronimo code at all.
> > >>
> > >> It turns out that we map to the "GBEAN" name when there is no
> > >> mappedName specified in the Openejb code.  In
> > >> o.a.openejb.config.GeronimoMappedName at line 65 there is this piece
> > >> of code which Geronimo is apparently very dependent upon
> > >>
> > >> if (null == mappedName && ref.getEjbRefName().equals("ejb/MEJB")) {
> > >>     ref.setMappedName("MEJBGBean/MEJB");
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> So I assume the mappedName must always be null and we need to force
> > >> this  mapping for Geronimo?
> > >>
> > >> Once I modified the name to match the newly enabled MEJB app's id,
> > >> "mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB", then I finally started to see failures that
> > >> matched what Anita indicated we should see without the correct
> > >> authorization.
> > >>
> > >> So what should we do with this openejb change?  We were hoping to
> > >> release Geronimo 2.0.2 with openejb 3.0-beta-1 which has the old name
> > >> still included.  There are probably other ways around this that would
> > >> only require Geronimo (such as making the new name match the old name
> > >> ... but that's really ugly) or perhaps TCK configuration changes.  Any
> > >> suggestions?
> > >
> > > How about you add a JNDI link from MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB?
> >
> > Thanks Dain.  I'd gladly to give this a try but I have no clue how to go
> > about defining a JNDI link to map MEJBGBean/MEJB to mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB.
> >    So far my searches have turned up anything that helps.  Can you give
> > me some pointers?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> >
>

Reply via email to