>
> Not *an* asynchronous method (singular) but *multiple* asynchronous methods
> (plural).  Do methods A, B, and C in parallel and wait for them to complete
> before continuing.  The asynchronous methods could each be doing a web
> service call, for example, that gather data needed to start the real work.
>

So why even have them as asynchronous methods, might as well have
synchronous calls to the web services.


-- 
Karan Singh Malhi

Reply via email to