The moment I pressed submit, I got the answer :). Ignore my last email On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not *an* asynchronous method (singular) but *multiple* asynchronous methods >> (plural). Do methods A, B, and C in parallel and wait for them to complete >> before continuing. The asynchronous methods could each be doing a web >> service call, for example, that gather data needed to start the real work. >> > > So why even have them as asynchronous methods, might as well have > synchronous calls to the web services. > > > -- > Karan Singh Malhi > -- Karan Singh Malhi
