+1 for support of either ActiveMQ 5.1 or 5.2. Not sure if it's to late for this but this would be a huge success since there some nice features in 5.1+ that are not available in 4.1.1
hgomez wrote: > >> I just rebuild an OpenEJB 3.1-SNAPSHOT and could see >> >> - OpenJPA 1.1.0 will be included, but I wonder if we could use also >> EclipseLink ? >> >> - CXF 2.0.4 is included and JAXB is 2.0.5. Could we use OpenEJB 3.1 >> with JAXWS 2.1.4 and JAXB 2.1.8 ? > > And what about ActiveMQ ? Will it be the 4.1 or 5.1 (or 5.2) ? > > Thanks > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-plan-for-OpenEJB-3.0.x-and-3.1-tp19760036p19845352.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
