If there was a good patch for it it'd be something we could slide in.
-David
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:04 PM, rde8026 wrote:
+1
for support of either ActiveMQ 5.1 or 5.2. Not sure if it's to late
for
this but this would be a huge success since there some nice features
in 5.1+
that are not available in 4.1.1
hgomez wrote:
I just rebuild an OpenEJB 3.1-SNAPSHOT and could see
- OpenJPA 1.1.0 will be included, but I wonder if we could use also
EclipseLink ?
- CXF 2.0.4 is included and JAXB is 2.0.5. Could we use OpenEJB 3.1
with JAXWS 2.1.4 and JAXB 2.1.8 ?
And what about ActiveMQ ? Will it be the 4.1 or 5.1 (or 5.2) ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-plan-for-OpenEJB-3.0.x-and-3.1-tp19760036p19845352.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
