Great ! 2009/6/17 David Blevins <[email protected]>
> I updated it to 3.1.2 for now. We can definitely go with something else if > we want. Though, hopefully we finally start the more incremental release > approach and release sooner than later, so maybe 3.1.2 is fine. > > -David > > > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > you are right but first we need to decide which is our next release to be >> :-) . >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Ivan<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your answer. >>> I just feel that, since 3.1.1 is released, the version number in the >>> trunk >>> should be something like 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT or 3.2-SNAPSHOT :-) >>> Ivan >>> >>> 2009/6/16 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> >>> >>> Well when OEJB 3.1.1 is released a tag is created for that release you >>>> can find it here >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.1.1/ . But in >>>> the trunk we keep the latest code committed. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ivan<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, I find that the version number in the trunk is 3.1.1 snapshot, but >>>>> >>>> 3.1.1 >>>> >>>>> has already been released. So does the version number in the trunk need >>>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>> be updated ? >>>>> Thanks ! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ivan >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ---- >>>> Thanks >>>> - Mohammad Nour >>>> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour >>>> ---- >>>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep >>>> moving" >>>> - Albert Einstein >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ivan >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ---- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour >> ---- >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >> - Albert Einstein >> >> > -- Ivan
