I think I've fixed the issues raised, and I've reformated the NOTICE files to remove the style of comment Kevan mentioned. The NOTICE files now look like this: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/NOTICE
Please note I've only removed the these comments, I haven't changed the content of the files. If someone is able to double-check some of the NOTICE files and advise if there's still a problem, I'd be grateful. If everything is looking good I'll try a new vote in the next couple of days. Jon On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > >> On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >> >> Hi Kevan, >>> >>> Many thanks for looking at this and pointing out these issues. I'll >>> cancel >>> this vote, and try again. >>> >>> Regarding point 4 - pretty much all of the content in the LICENSE and >>> NOTICE >>> files is the same as the files in OpenEJB itself, as the dependencies are >>> the same. Presumably that means we have potentially the same issue with >>> OpenEJB itself ( >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb3/assembly/openejb-standalone/src/main/resources/NOTICE.txtfor >>> example)? >>> >> >> Yes. Personally, I don't think they'd have to be cleaned up for a service >> release (e.g. 3.1.x). But should be cleaned up before the next major >> release. >> >> I'm probably guilty of creating that comments style, in the first place. >> Licensing policies/best practices evolve over time -- hopefully getting >> better... ;-) >> > > Thanks, Kevan, for the legal scouring. Very appreciated. Been over a > barrel on our stateful tx/caching issue. > > > -David > >
