On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:05 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:
> > No need. No-interface views can be remoted, so remote clients using > openejb-client can never get one. > Should that be "No-interface views cannot be remoted"? > BUT... it might be fun to do one day anyway, someday in the future, and > then sure more deps may be required. Spec-wise some of the original > annotation name ideas were @NoInterface, etc.. which didn't imply local vs > remote. @LocalBean was my suggestion and in the back of my mind I was > thinking an @RemoteBean might be a cool thing to add. > It didn't really occur to me that the "Local" part meant it wouldn't be remotely accessible, but its kinda obvious now! *blush* ;-) I was going to make it work from a client because it didn't seem like it would be that difficult now I've got the asm code done, along with the additional openejb-jee and DeploymentInfo code, and I've got a simple case working in Embedded mode. I'll hold off on that and write some more tests and get this packaged up instead, and perhaps do a @RemoteBean implementation later on. Jon
