On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:45 AM, David Blevins wrote: >> >>> Ok, finally got some binaries up. Took a few spins but finally got >>> something up with good signatures. >>> >>> The branch to become a tag: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.0.2/ >>> >>> The binaries: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-014/ >>> >>> So assuming these binaries pass the TCK, here is my +1 vote. >>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours or as long as it takes to get some TCK numbers >>> against the proposed binaries. >> >> >> Source and build look good. Is there a signed source archive? I didn't find >> one... > > Looks like for 3.0.1 we just relied on the individual signed source archives > created by maven, plus the svn tag. Seems good enough for this release as > well. > > I can whip up a tar of the tag if we feel we need it.
My understanding of current apache policy is that the only actually required and important artifact in a release is a source bundle sufficient to build the project from. Everything else is maven candy :-) If you use the current apache 7 pom as an ancestor you get this for free. Since AFAICT this source bundle is missing from the vote I have to vote -1 on what is out there now. I'd be pretty uncomfortable with a "whipped up" source archive that wasn't produced by the normal maven release procedure. thanks david jencks > > -David > >
