On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Ivan wrote:
Please ignore my previous request, it might not completly fix the
issue I
wanted :-(
Chatting with Ivan on IRC. We're going to try an alternate
technique to finding the issue. Basically the object in question is
not designed for multi-threaded use under the assumption that is
designed only to be used inside the transaction in which it was
created -- and all transactions are single threaded.
So we came up with an alternate patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12439747/OPENEJB-1246-alt.txt
We'll wait for some TCK data on that and see if that doesn't help
illuminate the issue caused by the related ActiveMQ fix Ivan is
working with.
So where are we at with the ActiveMQ/EJB issues?
-David
2010/3/25 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>
Hi David,
I'm trying to run the usual ant build script that grabs the itest
artifacts
from the Maven repository and tries to run them against OpenEJB
standalone
and in Tomcat. I'm getting a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/xbean/finder/ClassFinder error. (Full log and build
script
attached). Is this a problem?
Jon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:45 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]
>wrote:
Ok, finally got some binaries up. Took a few spins but finally got
something up with good signatures.
The branch to become a tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.0.2/
The binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-014/
So assuming these binaries pass the TCK, here is my +1 vote.
Vote open for 72 hours or as long as it takes to get some TCK
numbers
against the proposed binaries.
-David
--
Ivan
