Hey Daniel,
Daniel S. Haischt-3 wrote: > > Spring is Apache-licensed no? So the only issue might be with > re-distributing EclipseLink cause the Eclipse-license got some quirks > license-wise. But after all we would be just re-distributing it > unmodified which shouldn't be much of an issue. > OK Daniel S. Haischt-3 wrote: > > On the other hand > wouldnt it be feasible to have an impl-agnostic adapter that would > allow the end user to put whichever library into place? > It's actually the case (IMHO). You just need to drop OpenJPA jars from the openejb war and put Hibernate or EclipseLink dependencies. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/OpenEJB-3-1-3-tp2076950p2126284.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
