The only "issue" concerning the EPL I am aware of is that you have to re-distribute modified source code or make it publicly available. But in my previous mail I assumed that this is something we won't do (i.e. we would re-distribute an unmodified version).
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Henri Gomez <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right, we can't ship LGPL[1] code from Apache hardware, so that prevents us >> from shipping any Hibernate code. > > Argh right ;( > > EclipseLink is EPL and should be allowed. It's the RI and may be the > good 'implem' to have ? > >> We could go as far as building one, testing it, and publishing the jar list >> -- could even generate some ant script or something to grab those jars. > > Providing specifics ant/pom to produce this 'alternate' packages would > be a very good idea. > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >> >> >
