OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb trunk pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released owb 1.1.0 ?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < [email protected]> wrote: > I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not > aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there > are > and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots, but > am happy to do that if that's any help. > > Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can, as > it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have API > changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to > upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I guess > that might influence the decision. > > Jon > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration. > > Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I > > guess > > there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a patch > > version). > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > > > > > OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0 > > or > > > coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo. > > > > > > I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to > > > change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ? > > > > > > -- > > > Shawn > > > > > > -- Shawn
