If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew there are still some TCK failures
2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb > trunk > pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released > owb 1.1.0 ? > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not > > aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there > > are > > and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots, > but > > am happy to do that if that's any help. > > > > Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can, > as > > it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have > API > > changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to > > upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I > guess > > that might influence the decision. > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration. > > > Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I > > > guess > > > there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a > patch > > > version). > > > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > > > > > > > OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released > 1.1.0 > > > or > > > > coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo. > > > > > > > > I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have > to > > > > change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Shawn > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Shawn > -- Ivan
