I agree with the proposals in this thread. It would be great to see more work on the Jetty integration, but as there's a lot of work going on with TomEE so I have no problem with it going to the sandbox. I'm not sure where the spring module is at, but I think people are using it, so maybe that should stay where it is.
Jon On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 to split all is not directly involved in openejb/tomee in sandbox > modules > (spring, jetty, ...) > > - Romain > > 2011/8/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > > > > David Blevins-2 wrote: > > > > > > We want to trim or retire these from trunk: > > > > > > - container/openejb-activemq4 > > > - server/openejb-axis2 > > > - server/openejb-webadmin > > > > > > Probably we can also get rid of: > > > > > > - server/openejb-corba > > > - server/openejb-telnet > > > > > +1 > > > > > > David Blevins-2 wrote: > > > > > > Geronimo does use 'server/openejb-axis' so it would need to exist > > > somewhere. Here or Geronimo basically. > > > > > Also +1 > > > > > > David Blevins-2 wrote: > > > > > > On the note of duplicate utils, the only copying I'm aware of is in the > > > openejb-client jar and that is intentional to keep that jar independent > > > and the client classpath small. Has there been other copying? > > > > > Il was the case also for activemq-4 > > > > Another suggestion would be to better use ou sandbox area to store > > unterminated modules like: jetty, spring, junit or so > > > > Last would be to move deps sub module outside openejb3 to give them a > > different life cycle (ie. deliver deps without openejb). > > > > would be great to do that and to push a new snapshot. It would be also > nice > > to push a milestone may be. > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Pruning-OpenEJB-project-and-co-tp3686410p3768534.html > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
