I agree too. A release every 4 months with a feature freeze around 3 weeks ahead of the release would be good, should give a window for bug-fixing for the release. Once we agree upon the general time lines, I could go ahead and document this process. Predictable release cycles are always good from the users perspective too.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> wrote: > I definitely agree. Sounds great. > > Jon > On Sep 30, 2011 8:01 PM, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Was chatting with Romain and he mentioned some fixes he wanted to add that > didn't make this release. I imagine that there'll be plenty of fixes that > will happen over the next couple weeks. >> >> For several small reasons that add up and are totally unmeasurable, we > tend to drift into long release cycles. We say we're going to release more > frequently, but it hasn't happened yet. I'm thinking maybe we just need to > set the date to ensure we actually do. >> >> What do people think about a next release potentially as short as 2 weeks > from now? >> >> >> -David >> > -- Karan Singh Malhi twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
