+1 for a 4 mounths release with 3 weeks beta. - Romain
Le 30 sept. 2011 22:33, "Karan Malhi" <[email protected]> a écrit : > I agree too. A release every 4 months with a feature freeze around 3 > weeks ahead of the release would be good, should give a window for > bug-fixing for the release. Once we agree upon the general time lines, > I could go ahead and document this process. Predictable release cycles > are always good from the users perspective too. > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I definitely agree. Sounds great. >> >> Jon >> On Sep 30, 2011 8:01 PM, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Was chatting with Romain and he mentioned some fixes he wanted to add that >> didn't make this release. I imagine that there'll be plenty of fixes that >> will happen over the next couple weeks. >>> >>> For several small reasons that add up and are totally unmeasurable, we >> tend to drift into long release cycles. We say we're going to release more >> frequently, but it hasn't happened yet. I'm thinking maybe we just need to >> set the date to ensure we actually do. >>> >>> What do people think about a next release potentially as short as 2 weeks >> from now? >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >> > > > > -- > > Karan Singh Malhi > twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
