your remote test case works

do i let you the surprise of the solution i used?

- Romain


2011/10/28 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>

> i'm making it working in embedded mode now, just some minute to let me
> commited
>
> PS: i really would like to avoid to contribute our own enricher if it is
> not something directly linked to openejb
>
> - Romain
>
>
>
> 2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>
>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> > @RunAsClient = @Deployment(testable = false) (personnally i prefer the
>> > first
>> > one but i don't really care ;))
>> >
>> > if one of both is not true then the EJBInjectionEnricher is not called.
>> >
>> > One way to avoid it is to use "Local" protocol instead of "servlet 3.0"
>> in
>> > our container.
>> >
>> >
>> I think we need to make sure this works for the @Deployment(testable=true)
>> without @RunAsClient case as well. It doesn't for me at the moment - this
>> seems to be how a lot of the tests are setup in the showcase.
>>
>> When I've been running this, my experience is the Arquillian EJB enricher
>> is
>> called, but can't inject the bean (it can't lookup java:global, and the
>> global names we deploy are different to what it expects to see), hence the
>> code I added to the remote adapter. I'm happy to show you this on a screen
>> share if you like.
>>
>>
>>
>> > I prefer to avoid to copy paste existing code.
>> >
>>
>> +1. How about moving the enricher code to the common module?
>>
>>
>> >
>> > i'll try to connect this evening or tmr to help you on this point.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, I really appreciate it. I'm busy due to another commitment this
>> evening, but I'll be working on this and rehearsing for JAX all weekend.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Maybe we can start forking arquillian showcase on github (i think you
>> had
>> > an
>> > account?)
>> >
>>
>> +1. I do have a github a/c (jgallimore) and I have a fork of this on there
>> already. We ought to update the poms and arquillian .xml files and figure
>> out if there's any gaps.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jon
>>
>
>

Reply via email to