On Dec 15, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> both i think >> >> but well, karaf is a first step which can be enough for a lot of needs. > > Fully agree. You're right with the additional lib burden, which I > haven't thought before. It would rise the bar for memory consumption > and is an important factor to think about. Thanks!
As long as we have an option to run without it, I think it will be fine. -David
