tomee-connector? - Romain
2012/1/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > It seems the tomee-connector compiles now, but the build is still a big > mystery to me. > It now downloads > > Downloading: > http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/openejb/openejb-lite/4.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT/openejb-lite-4.0.0-beta-2-20120104.041102-100-sources.jar > > ??? > > Any explanations? > > We should build the whole stuff with | tee mvn.log and grep out all > 'Downloading' and revisit them. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:37 AM > > Subject: Re: Release time? > > > > +1 to upgrade if it doesn't break TCKs and the release is not far. > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/1/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >> if you have the openjpa-maven-plugin-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT, then you most > >> definitely also have openjpa itself in 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT. > >> > >> I'm using an internally released version of it in 2 projects, and > >> OpenJPA-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT is really stable. > >> > >> So we could also push for shipping an OpenJPA release. I can take over > >> driving this part (I'm OpenJPA committer). > >> I found quite a few (personal) show stoppers in openjpa-2.1.x which we > >> fixed in 2.2.x > >> > >> If you still like to use openjpa-2.1.x, then just use the > >> org.codehaus.mojo version of the plugin instead [1]. They are > basically the > >> same source, I just moved the plugin over to openjpa to make it easier > to > >> maintain and test with OpenJPA itself. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> [1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/openjpa-maven-plugin/ > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: David Blevins <[email protected]> > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Cc: > >> > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 7:56 AM > >> > Subject: Re: Release time? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:52 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> +1 > >> >>> > >> >>> Can we use timestamped snapshot as a workaround (for snapshot > > deps, I > >> > mean)? > >> >> > >> >> We could maybe release the code ourselves like Geronimo does from > > time > >> to > >> > time. Just copy it in, update the groupIds and release it. > >> > > >> > Looking at our snapshots we have: > >> > > >> > - javaee-api 6.0-3-SNAPSHOT > >> > - cxf 2.5.1-SNAPSHOT > >> > - owb 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT > >> > - bval 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT > >> > - karaf-maven-plugin 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > - openejb-openwebbeans-jsf 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT > >> > - org.apache.karaf.tooling.exam.container 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > - openjpa-maven-plugin 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > - openejb-jstl 1.3-SNAPSHOT > >> > > >> > Some of these will be easy to deal with, but these seem a bit > > trickier: > >> > > >> > - karaf-maven-plugin 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > - org.apache.karaf.tooling.exam.container 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > - openjpa-maven-plugin 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT > >> > > >> > From a compliance perpective it looks like we're good with the > > following > >> > previous versions: > >> > > >> > - cxf 2.5.0 > >> > - owb 1.1.3 > >> > - bval 0.3-incubating (our patched version) > >> > > >> > We could easily release again in two weeks or so when these things > are > >> all > >> > released. We keep saying we want to release more frequently but we > >> haven't > >> > yet done it. Releasing again when these binaries are out might be a > >> good way to > >> > get into that habit. > >> > > >> > Holding our release isn't that appealing and neither is using > >> > non-reproducable timestamped versions. Neither are really good > > habits. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > > >> > > >> > -David > >> > > >> > > >
