No, this ones is not available with previous owb. Was the same with interceptor bindings.
However i still think 1.1.4 should be used since it fixes issues relative to cdi 1.0 itself. - Romain Le 4 janv. 2012 18:19, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > -> the 0.3 release of bval means changing the bval tck setup > > -> the bug of owb 1.1.3 is not tested in TCKs (as a lot of others): > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224895 > > Cool. Can you file a JIRA for that one. > > This is basically the "can't add interceptors via an extension" bug right? > > > -David > > > > > 2012/1/4 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:33 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> > >>> if you have the openjpa-maven-plugin-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT, then you most > >> definitely also have openjpa itself in 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT. > >>> > >>> I'm using an internally released version of it in 2 projects, and > >> OpenJPA-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT is really stable. > >>> > >>> So we could also push for shipping an OpenJPA release. I can take over > >> driving this part (I'm OpenJPA committer). > >>> I found quite a few (personal) show stoppers in openjpa-2.1.x which we > >> fixed in 2.2.x > >> > >> Any gut feeling on how long releases take in OpenJPA-land? > >> > >>> If you still like to use openjpa-2.1.x, then just use the > >> org.codehaus.mojo version of the plugin instead [1]. They are basically > the > >> same source, I just moved the plugin over to openjpa to make it easier > to > >> maintain and test with OpenJPA itself. > >> > >> Probably the TCK will be the biggest indicator if we can switch, then > >> 2.2.x release time. > >> > >> Not sure where our SNAPSHOT discussions will end up, but I can see us > >> potentially releasing now with prior versions of the SNAPSHOTs then > >> beginning another release in 2-3 weeks as the newer versions come > along. > >> > >> Seems like there's some merit in releasing now and giving people just a > >> bit more time to get their releases out the door. > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]> > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Cc: > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 7:56 AM > >>>> Subject: Re: Release time? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:52 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can we use timestamped snapshot as a workaround (for snapshot deps, > I > >>>> mean)? > >>>>> > >>>>> We could maybe release the code ourselves like Geronimo does from > time > >> to > >>>> time. Just copy it in, update the groupIds and release it. > >>>> > >>>> Looking at our snapshots we have: > >>>> > >>>> - javaee-api 6.0-3-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - cxf 2.5.1-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - owb 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - bval 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - karaf-maven-plugin 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - openejb-openwebbeans-jsf 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - org.apache.karaf.tooling.exam.container 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - openjpa-maven-plugin 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - openejb-jstl 1.3-SNAPSHOT > >>>> > >>>> Some of these will be easy to deal with, but these seem a bit > trickier: > >>>> > >>>> - karaf-maven-plugin 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - org.apache.karaf.tooling.exam.container 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> - openjpa-maven-plugin 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT > >>>> > >>>> From a compliance perpective it looks like we're good with the > following > >>>> previous versions: > >>>> > >>>> - cxf 2.5.0 > >>>> - owb 1.1.3 > >>>> - bval 0.3-incubating (our patched version) > >>>> > >>>> We could easily release again in two weeks or so when these things are > >> all > >>>> released. We keep saying we want to release more frequently but we > >> haven't > >>>> yet done it. Releasing again when these binaries are out might be a > >> good way to > >>>> get into that habit. > >>>> > >>>> Holding our release isn't that appealing and neither is using > >>>> non-reproducable timestamped versions. Neither are really good > habits. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >> > >> > >
