Yeah, I suposed we could edit the SDK in intellij but I, like you, simply removed the lookup field of the annotation of that test so that I could move on.
Regards, Alan On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > i think openejb uses it only for one test so personnally i ignore this test > and when i worked on it i was using maven to compile/run it. > > not sure if it is possible to ignore class in all IDEs (i use Idea). > > - Romain > > > 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > >> Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions. >> >> I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more specific >> what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to work on >> openejb? >> >> Happy to update the developer documentation with this info. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> >> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> endorse your jdk. >>> >>> it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a >>> difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in >>> geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically >> endorsed. >>> >>> - Romain >>> >>> >>> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>> >>>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the >> Apple >>>> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of >>>> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do >>>> people work around this problem? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >> >>
