i didn't edit the SDK, when the compilation fails right clic on the test -> exclude and then all is fine :)
- Romain 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > Yeah, I suposed we could edit the SDK in intellij but I, like you, simply > removed the lookup field of the annotation of that test so that I could > move on. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > i think openejb uses it only for one test so personnally i ignore this > test > > and when i worked on it i was using maven to compile/run it. > > > > not sure if it is possible to ignore class in all IDEs (i use Idea). > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > > > >> Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions. > >> > >> I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more > specific > >> what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to > work on > >> openejb? > >> > >> Happy to update the developer documentation with this info. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > >> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> endorse your jdk. > >>> > >>> it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a > >>> difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in > >>> geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically > >> endorsed. > >>> > >>> - Romain > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the > >> Apple > >>>> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of > >>>> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How > do > >>>> people work around this problem? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Alan > >>>> > >> > >> > >
