Whichever gets done :) -David
On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no? > > - Romain > > Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> >> On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: >> >>> Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much >> time >>> since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project. >>> >>> The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs >>> running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final >>> release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK >> for >>> a new release. >> >> The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very >> stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final? >> >> >> -David >> >> >>> >>> Here is my +1 >>> >>> []s, >>> Thiago. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hehe, >>>> >>>> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB >> 4.0.0 >>>> >>>> Jean-Louis >>>> >>>> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the >>>>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go. >>>>> >>>>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0 >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Neale >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
