Yeap. I will try it tonight. Not exactly what I wanted, but I can live with that. :O) I will definitively need more time for the new interface, but we can have a quick path for the current one. []s, Thiago.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no? > > - Romain > > Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: > > > > > Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much > > time > > > since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project. > > > > > > The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs > > > running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final > > > release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK > > for > > > a new release. > > > > The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very > > stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final? > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > []s, > > > Thiago. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hehe, > > >> > > >> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB > > 4.0.0 > > >> > > >> Jean-Louis > > >> > > >> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >> > > >>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the > > >>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go. > > >>> > > >>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0 > > >>> > > >>> Best Regards, > > >>> Neale > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
