Abe, see my comment. On 6/19/07, Abe White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a matter of having user to specify on @Strategy with a long > name " > org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.meta.strats.XMLValueHandler" vs. a shorter > name. > "org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.xmlmapping.XMLValueHandler" Why do they have to specify an explicit strategy at all? Why not have built-in support for recognizing when to map to an XML column? This could be by defaulting to XML when we find a relation to a JAXB type that isn't annotated with any standard relationship type, or by introducing a new annotation, or...
Abe, This is the first stage of introducing xmlmapping support, next stepis to make it the built-in strategy for XML column if there is enough interests... Anyway, I will use the long name " org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.meta.strats.XMLValueHandler" for now. Catalina Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
