Hi Brett,We'd like to build both trunk and branches/1.0.x using continuum. These are two living code lines (with more to be added over time).
What's best practice in terms of continuum? I think adding a second project called OpenJPA 1.0.x would be appropriate, instead of adding 14 new projects to the existing OpenJPA project.
Please advise, Craig Begin forwarded message:
Questions:1. Should we move our continuum build at http:// vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action? projectGroupId=18 over to the "1.0.x" branch, or keep in on "trunk"?We can actually configure continuum to build both trunk and 1.0.x, and I'd think that this should be the default going forward. It makes sure that both the future 1.1 and the future 1.0.1 packages remain buildable (once we figure out why the distribution doesn't build from continuum).
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
