FWIW, I have a teamcity instance running that builds, tests, runs the tck, and uploads 1.0.x whenever there's a svn checkin.
-Patrick On 8/30/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you ask continuum-users or -dev? > > The branch support in Continuum is quite new and I don't have a lot > of experience with it, so Emmanuel will give a better answer. > > My impression is that, at the moment, the branch support is still > suited to switching a single project, not maintaining multiple ones, > so a separate group is probably appropriate (it's what we do on the > Maven one). > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 31/08/2007, at 3:30 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > Hi Brett, > > > > We'd like to build both trunk and branches/1.0.x using continuum. > > These are two living code lines (with more to be added over time). > > > > What's best practice in terms of continuum? I think adding a second > > project called OpenJPA 1.0.x would be appropriate, instead of > > adding 14 new projects to the existing OpenJPA project. > > > > Please advise, > > > > Craig > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > >>>> Questions: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Should we move our continuum build at http:// > >>>> vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action? > >>>> projectGroupId=18 over to the "1.0.x" branch, or keep in on > >>>> "trunk"? > >>> > >>> We can actually configure continuum to build both trunk and > >>> 1.0.x, and I'd think that this should be the default going > >>> forward. It makes sure that both the future 1.1 and the future > >>> 1.0.1 packages remain buildable (once we figure out why the > >>> distribution doesn't build from continuum). > > > > Craig Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > -- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907
