Re: Using acces-type PROPERTY

[Patrick Linskey]

Hi,




-Patrick

On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Arun Nagarajan wrote:

Can you post the source file and the full stack trace? Also, just in case something is going wrong with inner class support, could you try moving InnerProduct to be a top-level class?

Hi,
       I have a set of java classes which has only setter and getter

java classes, which have only getter and setter methods.

Fields "com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct.innerDesc,
com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct.innerName" are not a default
persistent type, and do not have any annotations indicating their

annotate them with @Transient.


and getInnerDesc as well as setInnerName and setInnerDesc methods. No
fields.

<entity class="com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct" access="PROPERTY">
          <table name="PRODUCT"/>
          <attributes>
             <basic name="InnerName">
                <column name="NAME"/>
             </basic>
             <basic name="InnerDesc">
                <column name="DESCRIPTION"/>
             </basic>
          </attributes>
       </entity>

Thanks and Regards,
arun...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arun N,
IBM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

methods (as they are generated using XML beans). At the entity level, I have defined the access as 'PROPERTY'. But when I try to persist them, I am getting the following error. Can you please let me know how to persist persistence strategy. If you do not want these fields to be persisted, The mapping.xml reads like this. The InnerProduct class has getInnerName

--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature