Re: Using acces-type PROPERTY

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Arun,




And what Patrick says...

Craig

On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Arun Nagarajan wrote:

Do you have any identity property in your beans? The missing identity property might be disguised as wrong default for the other persistent properties.

Hi,
       I have a set of java classes which has only setter and getter

java classes, which have only getter and setter methods.

Fields "com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct.innerDesc,
com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct.innerName" are not a default
persistent type, and do not have any annotations indicating their

annotate them with @Transient.


and getInnerDesc as well as setInnerName and setInnerDesc methods. No
fields.

<entity class="com.ibm.retail.Product$InnerProduct" access="PROPERTY">
          <table name="PRODUCT"/>
          <attributes>
             <basic name="InnerName">
                <column name="NAME"/>
             </basic>
             <basic name="InnerDesc">
                <column name="DESCRIPTION"/>
             </basic>
          </attributes>
       </entity>

Thanks and Regards,
arun...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arun N,
IBM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

methods (as they are generated using XML beans). At the entity level, I have defined the access as 'PROPERTY'. But when I try to persist them, I am getting the following error. Can you please let me know how to persist persistence strategy. If you do not want these fields to be persisted, The mapping.xml reads like this. The InnerProduct class has getInnerName

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature