I am for Rick's argument. It is just the use of localized message in TRACE are not consistent. I noticed that there are trace records that are localized and some are not, so just want to get a consensus of what we should target to do and what / if any action we need to reconcile the inconsistency.
Albert Lee. On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Dick <[email protected]> wrote: > Rick, Kevin and Albert started a discussion about trace messages based on > Ricks patch for > 1604< > http://n2.nabble.com/jira-Created-OPENJPA-1604-Setting-PessimisticLockManager-fails-to-append-for-update-clause-to-the-set-tp4827179p4873693.html > >. > The discussion warrants its own thread. > > FTR I agree with Rick. For logging we should localize the message > (warnings, > info, etc.), for trace localization is rarely beneficial and can be a > detriment. > > If there is a use case for localized trace I'd be interested in hearing it > though. > > -mike > -- Albert Lee.
