Debug is as good of a name as any other of we need a new log channel, if we need one.
I looked into it a big and DEBUG was removed when we were incubating. The commit was revision 429535 and wasn't attached to a JIRA so the rationale is hard to find - might have just been duplication between trace and debug. -mike On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Albert Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW...OpenJPA used to have a "DEBUG" channel, but has been deprecated, for > whatever historical or practical reason. > > Albert Lee > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Michael Dick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Pinaki, > > > > That's a different definition of TRACE than I'm used to. I was under the > > impression that trace *is* for developers. It's hard to find a consensus > on > > the Internet but I can point to this > > definition< > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracing_%28software%29#Event_logging_versus_tracing > > >which > > I think sums it up. > > > > If we do go with your definition of trace I'd argue that we need a new > log > > level which is for developers, not for users. > > > > -mike > > > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > TRACE messages are *not* for the developer -- they are for the user > > (under > > > duress and using them as the last resort to figure out a problem) and > > they > > > must be localized. > > > > > > During development a developer may temporarily use whatever mechanics > to > > > suit his/her style -- but once the development is complete, then > cleaning > > > the workspace is part of the work process. > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > Pinaki > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-localized-trace-messages-tp4877982p4878105.html > > > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > -- > Albert Lee. >
