+1 Catalina On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 removing official support of 1.5 on trunk. > > Would trunk continue to build 1.5 level binaries or would it switch to 1.6? > Is there any major benefit in building 1.6 level binaries? If not, there's > a good chance trunk *may* continue to work with JRE 1.5 if trunk uses a 1.5 > level build. > > -Jeremy > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, I know we've had this discussion for the 2.0 release, but now that > > you cannot receive free support updates to Sun/Oracle Java SE 5, I don't > > see why we would continue supporting it in the trunk code that will > > eventually become the 2.1 release. It is definitely a headache to > > continue building with 1.6 but support 1.5 for runtime and verify it by > > running our JUnits on 1.5. Also, we have the 2.0.x branch to support > > 1.5 users, so the debate about not allowing 1.5 users to move up to JPA > > 2.0 support no longer applies. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Donald > > > > >
