+1 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, catalina wei <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 > Catalina > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 removing official support of 1.5 on trunk. > > > > Would trunk continue to build 1.5 level binaries or would it switch to > 1.6? > > Is there any major benefit in building 1.6 level binaries? If not, > there's > > a good chance trunk *may* continue to work with JRE 1.5 if trunk uses a > 1.5 > > level build. > > > > -Jeremy > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > OK, I know we've had this discussion for the 2.0 release, but now that > > > you cannot receive free support updates to Sun/Oracle Java SE 5, I > don't > > > see why we would continue supporting it in the trunk code that will > > > eventually become the 2.1 release. It is definitely a headache to > > > continue building with 1.6 but support 1.5 for runtime and verify it by > > > running our JUnits on 1.5. Also, we have the 2.0.x branch to support > > > 1.5 users, so the debate about not allowing 1.5 users to move up to JPA > > > 2.0 support no longer applies. > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -Donald > > > > > > > > >
