I'm generally against milestone if there is no clear roadmap cause it pollutes users and they expect milestones/alpha/beta to not be usable so my 2cts would be for a final until somebody wish to propose some roadmap draft as back in time.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 31 oct. 2023 à 08:10, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 for fast milestone release :) > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 14:02 Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am also in favor of a milestone release, which might also serve to > check > > (and possibly fine-tune) the release process for 4.0. > > > > Regards. > > > > On 31/10/23 07:31, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > > From the sideline: I am still in favour for some sort of fast release > > (even a Milestone would be fine...) to be able to proceed with a TomEE 10 > > milestone 🙃 > > > > > > Gruß > > > Richard > > > > > > Am 31. Oktober 2023 07:14:20 MEZ schrieb Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>: > > >> Thanks Francesco, missed the bval release. > > >> > > >> With that gone we could approach a openjpa 4.0.0 release? > > >> Or should we go for JPA-3.1 API level immediately and only doing the > > release afterwards? > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >>> Am 29.10.2023 um 16:58 schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò < > > ilgro...@apache.org>: > > >>> > > >>> I've just set BVal 3.0.0 which seemed the correct action to take on > > OpenJPA > > >>> root pom. > > >>> > > >>> Regards. > > >>> > > >>> Il giorno dom 29 ott 2023 alle ore 13:33 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > >>> > > >>>> done but it is 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT now so openjpa can need to use the > final > > >>>> release (or temporarly you force the last snapshot in your pom) > > >>>> > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>>> < > > >>>> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Le dim. 29 oct. 2023 à 12:27, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > > ilgro...@apache.org> > > >>>> a écrit : > > >>>> > > >>>>> If so, I wonder how Ubuntu can work... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Anyway, do you think you can trigger a new deploy for BVal? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Il dom 29 ott 2023, 12:11 Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > ha > > >>>>> scritto: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Isnt it just the snapshot eviction on nexus? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Le dim. 29 oct. 2023 à 11:51, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > > ilgro...@apache.org> a écrit : > > >>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>> with latest 4.0.0SNAPSHOT artifacts, we've started getting build > > errors, but only on Windows and Mac OS. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The reported error is [1][2] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Failed to execute goal > > >>>>>>> org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-maven-plugin:4.0.0-SNAPSHOT:enhance > > (enhancer) > > >>>>>>> on project syncope-core-persistence-jpa: Execution enhancer of > goal > > >>>>>>> org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-maven-plugin:4.0.0-SNAPSHOT:enhance > > failed: > > >>>>>>> Plugin org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-maven-plugin:4.0.0-SNAPSHOT or > > one of its dependencies could not be resolved: The following artifacts > > could not be resolved: > > org.apache.bval:org.apache.bval.bundle:jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > > >>>>>>> (absent): Could not find artifact > > >>>>>>> org.apache.bval:org.apache.bval.bundle:jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in > > >>>>>>> apache.snapshots (https://repository.apache.org/snapshots) -> > > [Help1] > > >>>>>>> On Ubuntu, instead, all is working fine [3]. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> When I visit [4] I can see there is no artifact, as the error > > message is claiming. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> FTR, latest successful build is Oct 23rd, first failing is Oct > > 25th. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Any idea? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Regards. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/syncope/actions/runs/6677784818/job/18148134892 > > >>>>>>> [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/syncope/actions/runs/6677784818/job/18148134968 > > >>>>>>> [3] > > > https://github.com/apache/syncope/actions/runs/6677784818/job/18148134801 > > >>>>>>> [4] > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/bval/org.apache.bval.bundle/3.0.0-SNAPSHOT/ > > > > -- > > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > > > >
