Hi,

I guess it is just a matter of faking an em for the init time so can be a
quick win but I would lower the bar to still pass previous TCK and not
provide the API, should enable to still work.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
<https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old
Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>


Le mar. 18 mars 2025 à 00:12, Paulo Araújo <cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Fix every tests on TCK will demand too much time and I guess the project
> can't wait to release.
>
> I guess 4.1.0 is a good number.
>
> Best regards,
> Paulo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---- Em dom, 16 mar 2025 22:59:35 -0300 Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com> escreveu ---
>
>
>
> Hello Paulo,
>
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 22:18, Paulo Araújo <mailto:
> cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, guys!
> >
> > I am studying OPENJPA-2925 and probably won't finish it in current
> window, but I don't think it is a blocker for release.
> >
> > Tried to run Jakarta JPA 3.1 TCK on openjpa master, but there is a
> blocker NPE on almost every test (they do EMF.getProperties() before
> initializing a concrete EM).
>
> As far as I can see EMF with it's properties is being initialized in
> `public void setUp()` of each test
> I was able to get NPE if `getProperties()` is being called before EMF
> is initialized ...
>
> I can invest some time and move everything to JUnit5 (but this change
> would be huge ... :)))
>
> > At least the new 3.1 features passed with a quick change to avoid the
> NPE.
> >
> > Is the version numbering correct, considering the change of JPA
> dependency (3.0 to 3.1)?
> >
>
> we can change the version to be 4.1.0
> WDYT? :)
>
> > Anyway, this is my non-biding +1
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Paulo
> >
> >
> > On 2025/03/16 05:17:07 Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks Maxim!
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Il dom 16 mar 2025, 02:31 Maxim Solodovnik <mailto:mailto:
> so...@gmail.com> ha
> >
> > > scritto:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Hello All,
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > recently we have fixed multiple JPA 3.1. related issues :)
> >
> > > > I have created PR with dependencies update:
> >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/openjpa/pull/128
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > I propose to merge #128 and release :))
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > --
> >
> > > > Best regards,
> >
> > > > Maxim
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim

Reply via email to