On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:50:56PM -0400, Paul Spencer wrote: > I'm ambivalent on this. I am not convinced that we need unanimity > (?) on any given issue, but I do think we need everyone to vote so > that we are certain there are no dissenting votes. I also think > there may be a certain amount of pressure felt by someone that they > have to vote with the rest of the PSC even though they are not > necessarily fully supportive (or even just ambivalent). > > Discuss ... :)
I think that license changes are important enough that if you can't get unanimous approval of the PSC, then "You're doing it wrong"[1]. That said, I would consider a "+0" to be part of a 'unanimous vote' -- indicating no veto -- and since a single -1 vetoes a vote nayway, the practical change to this would only be that all members would have to vote. However, now that I think about it, I think all PSC members really should be voting "+1" to change a license. If you can't get that level of approval, then you shouldn't be changing the license.c [1] http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v476/macjinx/campingmacro.jpg Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
