Christopher Schmidt píše v Pá 19. 10. 2007 v 10:18 -0400: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:08:35PM +0200, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > > > Good point. I had forgotten about that. We should update teh RFC to take > > > that (and other things in this thread) into account. > > > > > > > I was thinking, that rather then return default "en" translation, it > > could return the untranslated message back. Since I still suppose, > > translation keys will be strings in english, result will be the same. > > Right. Though perhaps support for a 'fallback' language in addition to > just returning the translation string makes sense? It wouldn't be that > hard, in any case -- a couple extra lines of code in String.translate() > > Regards,
just to be sure: "support" yes, but not "assume", everything will always be translated even in "fallback" language jachym -- Jachym Cepicky e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://les-ejk.cz GPG: http://www.les-ejk.cz/pgp/jachym_cepicky-gpg.pub
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
