I've added my timeslot, but also noted that I will not be a regular participant, only attending when there is an issue of concern to Mapbuilder of development are doing at work. So take other participants preferences into account before mine. I don't want to see someone take an inconvenient timeslot, then get disappointed because I don't turn up.
Tim Schaub wrote: > Hey- > > Ok, for those who have expressed a time preferences, I have added your > vote. Please change/add yourself if you care. > > http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Proposal/Meetings#MeetingTime > > Tim > > Erik Uzureau wrote: > >> so weekly, then >> >> On 2/27/08, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hey- >>> >>> Erik Uzureau wrote: >>> >>>> how often are meetings? >>>> >>> As often as Wednesday. (Or whatever other day we pick.) >>> >>> Don't think we should feel bad missing them, or cutting out early. Just >>> think it's good to have a timeslot - once a week - where we know that we >>> can toss around ideas with some structure. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>>> +1 on having regular meetings, as long as they are 30 min no more no less >>>> +1 on both proposed time slots >>>> >>>> e >>>> >>>> On 2/27/08, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey- >>>>> >>>>> I think the project would benefit from regularly scheduled meetings. >>>>> I've proposed as much here: >>>>> http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Proposal/Meetings >>>>> >>>>> This is prompted by the current situation with the 2.6 release. There >>>>> are a number of issues that would be good to talk about as a group. I'm >>>>> primarily interested in having regular contributing developers toss >>>>> around ideas for 30 minutes or less - once a week. >>>>> >>>>> If others are willing, I'd like to talk about the release process in our >>>>> first meeting. Specifically, it would be good to talk about whether we >>>>> can rotate the job of release manager, whether or not we should branch >>>>> (or otherwise keep out new features) prior to a release, and any other >>>>> ideas people have. >>>>> >>>>> I'm willing to take the role of meeting organizer for the first month of >>>>> meetings. I don't imagine these things adding a bunch more overhead to >>>>> our work lives. Just adding a bit of structure to what we already >>>>> accomplish (with varying degrees of success) in a more ad hoc way. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> Tim >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> !DSPAM:4033,47c5ba82236071628642973! >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Systems Architect Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Commercial Support for Geospatial Open Source Solutions http://www.lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts.html _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
