Hey- Cameron Shorter wrote: > I've added my timeslot, but also noted that I will not be a regular > participant, only attending when there is an issue of concern to > Mapbuilder of development are doing at work. So take other participants > preferences into account before mine. I don't want to see someone take > an inconvenient timeslot, then get disappointed because I don't turn up.
Thanks Cameron. If the Camptocampers, Andreas, and any other Europeans are interested in the idea, I hope to hear their preferences as well. Tim > > Tim Schaub wrote: >> Hey- >> >> Ok, for those who have expressed a time preferences, I have added your >> vote. Please change/add yourself if you care. >> >> http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Proposal/Meetings#MeetingTime >> >> Tim >> >> Erik Uzureau wrote: >> >>> so weekly, then >>> >>> On 2/27/08, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey- >>>> >>>> Erik Uzureau wrote: >>>> >>>>> how often are meetings? >>>>> >>>> As often as Wednesday. (Or whatever other day we pick.) >>>> >>>> Don't think we should feel bad missing them, or cutting out early. Just >>>> think it's good to have a timeslot - once a week - where we know that we >>>> can toss around ideas with some structure. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>>> +1 on having regular meetings, as long as they are 30 min no more no less >>>>> +1 on both proposed time slots >>>>> >>>>> e >>>>> >>>>> On 2/27/08, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey- >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the project would benefit from regularly scheduled meetings. >>>>>> I've proposed as much here: >>>>>> http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Proposal/Meetings >>>>>> >>>>>> This is prompted by the current situation with the 2.6 release. There >>>>>> are a number of issues that would be good to talk about as a group. I'm >>>>>> primarily interested in having regular contributing developers toss >>>>>> around ideas for 30 minutes or less - once a week. >>>>>> >>>>>> If others are willing, I'd like to talk about the release process in our >>>>>> first meeting. Specifically, it would be good to talk about whether we >>>>>> can rotate the job of release manager, whether or not we should branch >>>>>> (or otherwise keep out new features) prior to a release, and any other >>>>>> ideas people have. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm willing to take the role of meeting organizer for the first month of >>>>>> meetings. I don't imagine these things adding a bunch more overhead to >>>>>> our work lives. Just adding a bit of structure to what we already >>>>>> accomplish (with varying degrees of success) in a more ad hoc way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
