Hi All, I hope it's not too late - I've just tried RC3 and tink it's OK.
+1 from me :) Best regards, Irina. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Vasya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I have tested RC3 and not found critical errors. > > +1 > > Thanks, > Vasiliy. > > > > > On 22.03.2013 21:52, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >> Dear OpenMeetings Community, >> >> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC3 >> >> RC2 was rejected due to broken audio/video setup panel >> >> Main changes are covered in the Readme: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/**README<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/README> >> >> Full Changelog:http://svn.apache.**org/repos/asf/openmeetings/** >> tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG> >> >> Release artefacts:https://dist.apache.**org/repos/dist/dev/** >> openmeetings/2.1/rc3/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/> >> >> Tag:http://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.**1RC3/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/> >> >> PGP release keys (signed using C467526E): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/**KEYS<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/KEYS> >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> My vote is +1. >> >> >> >
