... md5 sums and signature seem to be all good to go.
2013/3/30 [email protected] <[email protected]> > I think Irina is right. Those are no blockers but would be good to fix as > soon as possible. > > +1 > > > 2013/3/28 Irina Arkhipets <[email protected]> > >> I've just noticed one more problem in UI, but I would suggest have a >> release now without the fix. >> >> User properties screen contains useless "SIP Account Settings" section >> which is actuallu empty. it seems like this is not a regression and >> presents in previous version too. >> I am going to file a bug about this. >> >> Again - I don't think this is a blocker for the release. >> >> Best regards. >> Irina. >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alexei Fedotov <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > Same for me. I have not installed release myself, yet if Denis's >> > installation correctly matches a release, I spend a good amount of time >> > using it. >> > >> > Right now the only thing which attracted my eye is inconsistent >> microphone >> > status indication when entering conference or updating conference >> settings. >> > This is not a blocker. >> > >> > -- >> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >> > http://dataved.ru/ >> > +7 916 562 8095 >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:13 AM, [email protected] < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I had no time to check the signatures and md5 sums yet. >> > > But in respect to all the improvments to the testing I think the >> release >> > > will be successful. >> > > >> > > Sebastian >> > > Am 28.03.2013 03:23 schrieb "Irina Arkhipets" < >> [email protected] >> > >: >> > > >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > I hope it's not too late - I've just tried RC3 and tink it's OK. >> > > > >> > > > +1 from me :) >> > > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Irina. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Vasya <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hello All, >> > > > > >> > > > > I have tested RC3 and not found critical errors. >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Vasiliy. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 22.03.2013 21:52, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Dear OpenMeetings Community, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings >> > 2.1.0 >> > > > RC3 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> RC2 was rejected due to broken audio/video setup panel >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Main changes are covered in the Readme: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/**README >> > < >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/README> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Full Changelog:http://svn.apache.**org/repos/asf/openmeetings/** >> > > > >> tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG< >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Release artefacts:https://dist.apache.**org/repos/dist/dev/** >> > > > >> openmeetings/2.1/rc3/< >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.**1RC3/< >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> PGP release keys (signed using C467526E): >> > > > >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/**KEYS< >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/KEYS> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 approve >> > > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > > >> >> > > > >> My vote is +1. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
