yes, sounds good. I will probably need 2-3 days to create some article, but that should be fine actually.
Sebastian 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > Here is the example: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.39/ > The structure is our own responsibility :) > Since I need to rename 2.1 to 2.1.0 I can move source out of src as made > here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/wicket/6.6.0/ > > I'll update website and will write announce > > Can you write to the blog and to [email protected] ? > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, >> >> I did not really expect that this folder structure of the RC candidate >> will be exactly the folder structure of our distribution area. >> Is there an example of any Apache Project that does organize the sources >> and binaries like that? >> If yes then we might be able to continue the release process. >> If not we might simply change the structure and wait another 24 horus for >> the mirrors to sync. >> >> There is also plenty of other stuff todo: >> - updating the website as soon as the mirrors have synced >> - Writing the announce message to several lists >> - catching up with the press team at [email protected] to find out how >> we can work together and provide them with nice article for our first >> release >> - write a nice blog post at blogs.apache.org >> >> That is what comes to my mind. Actually those tasks are not all part of >> the todos of the release manager. Anybody of us can take care of for >> example writing the blog post. >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >> >>> Hello Sebastian, >>> >>> While creating file/folder structure I inspected some other projects, >>> flex, wicket, tomcat, mina etc.all of them have binaries and sources >>> somehow separated, I'll rename the folder in the dist as soon as we will >>> agree on folder structure (was hope the structure was reviewed on release >>> candidates ...) since it blocks announce (mirrors need to be synced) >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM, [email protected] < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Maxim, >>>> >>>> could you plz check if our binaries and sources are correctly organized? >>>> I am currently not sure, the other projects seem to have the structure: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/binaries/ >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/sources/ >>>> >>>> while we do create a binary and source folder for each version. >>>> >>>> I know this might be picky but its our first release and it is likely >>>> that the conventions we make now will stay like that forever. >>>> >>>> So are we going to create a separate folder for each release? >>>> So https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.1/bin >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.2/bin >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.3/bin >>>> Is that in line with the ASF docs ? >>>> >>>> The other projects seem to cut the 0 in the name of the release. We >>>> have it now with the folder name 2.1 and the package itself is called >>>> 2.1.0. Please decide for either one :) >>>> Either you call the folder (if there is one for each release) 2.1.0 and >>>> the package 2.1.0 or call the folder 2.1 and the package has the name 2.1 >>>> :) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
