done
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote: > OK, so the only change I made is renaming 2.1 to be 2.1.0. > Is this correct? > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:48 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> yes, >> >> sounds good. I will probably need 2-3 days to create some article, but >> that should be fine actually. >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >> >>> Here is the example: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.39/ >>> The structure is our own responsibility :) >>> Since I need to rename 2.1 to 2.1.0 I can move source out of src as made >>> here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/wicket/6.6.0/ >>> >>> I'll update website and will write announce >>> >>> Can you write to the blog and to [email protected] ? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, [email protected] < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, >>>> >>>> I did not really expect that this folder structure of the RC candidate >>>> will be exactly the folder structure of our distribution area. >>>> Is there an example of any Apache Project that does organize the >>>> sources and binaries like that? >>>> If yes then we might be able to continue the release process. >>>> If not we might simply change the structure and wait another 24 horus >>>> for the mirrors to sync. >>>> >>>> There is also plenty of other stuff todo: >>>> - updating the website as soon as the mirrors have synced >>>> - Writing the announce message to several lists >>>> - catching up with the press team at [email protected] to find out how >>>> we can work together and provide them with nice article for our first >>>> release >>>> - write a nice blog post at blogs.apache.org >>>> >>>> That is what comes to my mind. Actually those tasks are not all part of >>>> the todos of the release manager. Anybody of us can take care of for >>>> example writing the blog post. >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hello Sebastian, >>>>> >>>>> While creating file/folder structure I inspected some other projects, >>>>> flex, wicket, tomcat, mina etc.all of them have binaries and sources >>>>> somehow separated, I'll rename the folder in the dist as soon as we will >>>>> agree on folder structure (was hope the structure was reviewed on release >>>>> candidates ...) since it blocks announce (mirrors need to be synced) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM, [email protected] < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> could you plz check if our binaries and sources are correctly >>>>>> organized? >>>>>> I am currently not sure, the other projects seem to have the >>>>>> structure: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/binaries/ >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/sources/ >>>>>> >>>>>> while we do create a binary and source folder for each version. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know this might be picky but its our first release and it is likely >>>>>> that the conventions we make now will stay like that forever. >>>>>> >>>>>> So are we going to create a separate folder for each release? >>>>>> So https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.1/bin >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.2/bin >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.3/bin >>>>>> Is that in line with the ASF docs ? >>>>>> >>>>>> The other projects seem to cut the 0 in the name of the release. We >>>>>> have it now with the folder name 2.1 and the package itself is called >>>>>> 2.1.0. Please decide for either one :) >>>>>> Either you call the folder (if there is one for each release) 2.1.0 >>>>>> and the package 2.1.0 or call the folder 2.1 and the package has the name >>>>>> 2.1 :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
