Hello Sebastian,

Why do we need this limitation: "Apache Ldap, so that only PMC can login"?


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:46 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Tony,
>
> this sounds all very reasonable.
>
> The bottleneck in our calculations are often bandwidth requirements.
> Memory/disk usage does pretty much scale linear with number of users, but
> bandwidth does more like exponential with the number of concurrent
> sessions.
>
> However I would not be too concerned about the bandwidth, this server is
> basically for functional verification, not for load tests.
> On an average daily peak there might be maybe 10-20, on a quartly year peak
> there might be up to 50 people online at the same time.
>
> One of the goals would be for instance to run automated Selenium tests
> against the server and have a daily builder scripts that installes nightly
> snapshots of the application.
>
> So this should be sufficient for our needs.
>
> My suggestion would be that we use the LDAP connector of OpenMeetings to
> integration with the Apache Ldap, so that only PMC can login. This is
> something we can set up once we have the server, however we might need some
> pointers from Infra to get the right urls/configs in place.
>
> Thanks!
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> 2013/9/24 Tony Stevenson <[email protected]>
>
> > Ultimately we will need a spec for the VM yes.  However it is infra who
> > will approve the spec in the first instance.  The only real restrictions
> > are:
> >
> > 1 - available resources on the physical host
> > 2 - subject to fair use of the resources
> > 3 - we oblige any local restrictions (providers etc)
> >
> > So in my head I woudl say something like :
> >
> > 2-4 vcpus
> > 8 GB RAM max (needs some level of justification)
> > 100GB disk
> > and reasonable use of bandwidth
> >
> > I know these might be inappropriate - but these are nothing more than
> > starting points for the conversation to start.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > On 24/09/13 08:49, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >> I think they are waiting for a spec.
> >> However I am still a bit confused who needs to approve that spec?
> >> Do we need the ASF board to approve that spec?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sebastian
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/9/24 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>  Dear Tony,
> >>>
> >>> Are the any updates on this topic?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Tony Stevenson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  We need to get a vmware host specced up, agreed, purchased, delivered,
> >>>> racked, installed, configured, a VM created etc,
> >>>> Once we know this is what we want to do we will need to allow ~1 month
> >>>> turn-around time.  Maybe 6 weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Primarily the delay is in the order, racking, and installing stages.
> >>>>  But
> >>>> also bear in mind our new EU colo has very few services in it.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7 Jun 2013, at 07:19, Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  Artyom,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tony said,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> actually someone just reminded me that our new EU colo provider
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> has enough bandwidth to cope with your request - however it is not
> >>>>>
> >>>> QoSed
> >>>
> >>>> so it cannot be guaranteed - but giving the amount they made available
> >>>>> to us I dont think you would make a significant dent in that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tony, what would be our next step to set up the server at EU colo
> >>>>>
> >>>> provider?
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>>>> http://dataved.ru/
> >>>>> +7 916 562 8095
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Alexei Fedotov
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Tony, as I have said, the requirements are not as important as the
> >>>>>> fact we have the server running. For those who feel that bandwidth
> is
> >>>>>> not enough or is not reliable enough there is always an option to
> >>>>>> switch to other test servers (or install their own server). We may
> add
> >>>>>> a warning message at the welcome screen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As for your previous question, my AWS bills for two test servers are
> >>>>>> ~$30 per month though micro-instance is kinda slow, and hetzner
> bills
> >>>>>> are approx. ~$30 per server. For 100 Mbit/s connected server located
> >>>>>> in Russia (with higher hosting costs) I pay 250$ / month.
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>>>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>>>>> http://dataved.ru/
> >>>>>> +7 916 562 8095
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Tony Stevenson <[email protected]
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Tony Stevenson wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 06:46:55PM +0100:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alexei Fedotov wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:32:12PM +0400:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Tony, I'm sorry. This was discussed for sure. Things sometimes
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> change over
> >>>>
> >>>>>  time, that's why I have asked once again.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We have have several test servers and chat channels hosted
> around.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My
> >>>
> >>>>  intention was to have more
> >>>>>>>>> development resources hosted @apache and branded by apache.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Generally that is a good thing.  However your requirements are
> >>>>>>>> significant, and this is not something we could in all good faith
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> commit
> >>>>
> >>>>>  too. Sorry.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alexi, actually someone just reminded me that our new EU colo
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> provider
> >>>
> >>>>  has enough bandwidth to cope with your request - however it is not
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> QoSed
> >>>>
> >>>>> so it cannot be guaranteed - but giving the amount they made
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> available
> >>>
> >>>>  to us I dont think you would make a significant dent in that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The only issue now is the lack of hardware in this location to
> 'make
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> it
> >>>
> >>>>  so'. We could look at purchasing a new box for the site, but we
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> wouldnt
> >>>
> >>>>  be able to guarantee you the 25% of the server you wanted, and it
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> would
> >>>
> >>>>  be a virtual machine that we'd give you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The colo would be in Europe, specifically in Germany.  Would this
> be
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> an
> >>>
> >>>>  issue for you?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please let us know, and I *might* be able to carry this forward.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please do not mis-read my reply - I was trying to be open and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> honest.
> >>>
> >>>>  While over time we might well be able to offer you all the hardware
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> you
> >>>>
> >>>>>  need, it is so very extremely unlikely we could meet your bandwidth
> >>>>>>>> needs. All our bandwidth is donated to us for free, and as such it
> >>>>>>>> doesnt come in huge quantities; and where we do have it we have to
> >>>>>>>> prioritise core services over that of development instances (i.e.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> svn
> >>>
> >>>>  and http over that of pmc specific needs).  It's not that we dont
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> want
> >>>
> >>>>  to help, but we only have finite resources, and we need to be
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> careful
> >>>
> >>>>  not to over commit them.  Bandwith is one such commodity where we
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> need
> >>>
> >>>>  to be careful.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> One option that springs to mind is the use of AWS and friends,
> while
> >>>>>>>> they will not guarantee you the resources you want I suspect you
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> might
> >>>
> >>>>  get somewhere close most of the time. Though again, if you need
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> these
> >>>
> >>>> as
> >>>>
> >>>>>  a minimum resource at all times we will have to look elsewhere.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There might be some money free in the budget to allow you to use
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> such
> >>>
> >>>> a
> >>>>
> >>>>>  service. Before we throw up n VMs in an attempt to guess if it will
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> work
> >>>>
> >>>>>  for you, can you perhaps go back to your PMC and discuss the idea of
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> VMs
> >>>>
> >>>>>  with the likes of AWS, and when you find a vendor please do a little
> >>>>>>>> research into the options, then let us know what you want to do.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   Please
> >>>>
> >>>>>  note that the budget is not endless, and if you want to saturate
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 20Mb/s
> >>>>
> >>>>>  or more, then I guess the bill from AWS will be significant and you
> >>>>>>>> might not get a lot of AWS time as a reuslt - so please look
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> carefully
> >>>
> >>>>  and come back to us with options and we can take those forward for
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> you.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm pushing this back to you to do the research as we are kinda
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> snowed
> >>>
> >>>>  under somewhat and if you can do this part we might just be able to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> say
> >>>>
> >>>>>  "go for it" and let you have at it.  I stress 'might' :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>> Tony
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>>>>>> Tony Stevenson
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://www.pc-tony.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66
> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Tony
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>>>>> Tony Stevenson
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.pc-tony.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66
> >>>>>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Tony
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>> Tony Stevenson
> >>>>
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.pc-tony.com
> >>>>
> >>>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66
> >>>> ------------------------------**----
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tony
> >
> > ------------------------------**----
> > Tony Stevenson
> >
> > [email protected]
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://www.pc-tony.com
> > GPG - 1024D/51047D66
> > ------------------------------**----
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> [email protected]
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to