Thanks Maxim for responding. My use case requires the use of several servers running the application in cluster mode to get more connections.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Sonia, > > First let's check if I understand you correctly: you would like to run > multiple docker containers on one physical machine > and would like to compare performance with single OM server being run on > the same machine? > > if yes I can see no place for performance improvement > > Theoretically you can add dockerized OM instances to the cluster as soon as > server bandwidth will be exhausted, but these nodes need to be on another > network wire ... > > Maybe you can describe your use case? > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 22:17, Sonia SWEngineer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Good day All, > > I am evaluating the use of Docker to deploy a customized screen recording > > application based on Open Meetings (server component and client > component). > > Without Docker, the server application was tested for the maximum number > of > > concurrent recordings in a given hardware (CPU resource). > > Questions: > > - If Docker is used for deployment in the same exact hardware and several > > instances are run. Will it improve the performance of the CPU resources > > with more concurrent recordings in the same hardware, or most likely the > > opposite will occur due to the overhead of having another tool? > > - Will each instance running via Docker require a different serverId? > > > > Thanks in advance for any ideas or advice on this. > > > > Regards, > > > > Sonia > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
