Better performance will require running containers on different physical machines
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 04:05, Sonia SWEngineer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Maxim for responding. My use case requires the use of several > servers running the application in cluster mode to get more connections. > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello Sonia, > > > > First let's check if I understand you correctly: you would like to run > > multiple docker containers on one physical machine > > and would like to compare performance with single OM server being run on > > the same machine? > > > > if yes I can see no place for performance improvement > > > > Theoretically you can add dockerized OM instances to the cluster as soon > as > > server bandwidth will be exhausted, but these nodes need to be on another > > network wire ... > > > > Maybe you can describe your use case? > > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 22:17, Sonia SWEngineer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Good day All, > > > I am evaluating the use of Docker to deploy a customized screen > recording > > > application based on Open Meetings (server component and client > > component). > > > Without Docker, the server application was tested for the maximum > number > > of > > > concurrent recordings in a given hardware (CPU resource). > > > Questions: > > > - If Docker is used for deployment in the same exact hardware and > several > > > instances are run. Will it improve the performance of the CPU resources > > > with more concurrent recordings in the same hardware, or most likely > the > > > opposite will occur due to the overhead of having another tool? > > > - Will each instance running via Docker require a different serverId? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any ideas or advice on this. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sonia > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
